BuilderProofv0.1

Benchmarks

Versioned, reproducible benchmarks of AI app builders - methodology-first and version-stamped.

76 posts

Agency suitability

Agency-suitability benchmark: whitelabel, MCP and API surface (June 2026)

Agencies build for clients, which changes what matters: can you remove the builder's branding, drive it programmatically, integrate via a stable API and export the code you ship? This page defines the BuilderProof agency-suitability axis across those four capabilities. The June 2026 scored table was placeholder data and was withdrawn on August 21, 2026, so the page documents method only and ranks no builder.

6 min read168
Deploy quality

Deploy-quality benchmark: SEO, accessibility and performance audits (June 2026)

The BuilderProof deploy-quality axis audits the production build of a generated app on three independent dimensions: Lighthouse performance, axe-core accessibility plus a manual keyboard-and-landmark pass, and a structured SEO checklist. The June 2026 audit table was placeholder data and was withdrawn on August 21, 2026, so this page documents method only.

6 min read197
Speed

Speed-to-first-paint across AI app builders (June 2026)

The BuilderProof speed protocol uses two stopwatches rather than one number: speed-to-first-paint (prompt to first rendered preview frame) and time-to-working-app (prompt to all acceptance checks passing with zero manual edits), across five cold runs on a fixed network profile. The June 2026 timing table was placeholder data and was withdrawn on August 21, 2026.

6 min read245
Output quality

Benchmarking output quality across 7 AI app builders (June 2026)

The BuilderProof output-quality axis: brief OQ-7 and a rubric grading visual fidelity, code structure and functional correctness, weighted so correctness and structure outrank visuals. The June 2026 scored table was placeholder data and was withdrawn on August 21, 2026, so this page documents method only and ranks no builder.

6 min read207